As a professional photographer who used most models of the Canon 5D series of DSLRs, and who recently made the switch to mirrorless with the Canon R5, I thought it would be useful to review the 5D line, its origins and how it developed before its recent replacement. Each iteration of the 5D brought new and exciting features that improved image quality and technical capabilities, making it a popular choice among photographers and filmmakers alike. In this article, I will delve into the technical and image quality differences of the Canon 5D series, from the original Mark I to the most recent Mark IV.

 

Canon 5D Mark I

 

The Canon 5D Mark I was released in 2005 and was a game-changer for photographers. It was the first full-frame camera that was affordable and widely available, which opened up new possibilities for image quality and low-light performance. The camera had a 12.8-megapixel CMOS sensor, a 9-point autofocus system, and a maximum ISO of 1600.

 

Compared to today's standards, the Canon 5D Mark I may seem limited in its capabilities. However, it was a ground breaking camera that introduced many photographers to the world of full-frame digital photography. One of the main advantages of the camera was its 35mm equivalent sensor, which allowed for a shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

 

The Canon 5D Mark I was compatible with the massive range of Canon EF lenses including the L-series so beloved by working photographers for their image quality, sharpness and robustness. This made it an attractive option for photographers who already owned Canon lenses that they were using with 35mm film bodies and wanted to upgrade to a full-frame digital camera without breaking the bank. At the time, I was shooting 35mm film with a Canon EOS30, an interesting camera in itself with its Eye Control autofocus system which, after you'd calibrated it by pointedly looking around the viewfinder, attempted to track your eye movements and focus on the things in the frame you were looking at, with some fairly mixed results. Eye Control made it down to the EOS 30 from the EOS 3 and EOS 5 but was later dropped for 30 years before a glorious and perhaps somewhat unexpected return in the latest R3 models

The 5D Mk1 slotted into my camera bag as a direct replacement for the EOS 30. The most noticeable change this switch brought about as a working professional was an almost immediate end to daily visits to the processing lab and complete removal of film and processing costs from the business. What it brought in its stead was long hours of digital editing, a process that now takes up 30% of my working time.

 

While the Canon 5D Mark I was a remarkable camera for its time, it did have limitations in terms of autofocus performance and image quality compared to later models in the series.

 

Canon 5D Mark I:

 

12.8-megapixel CMOS sensor

ISO range of 100-1600 (expandable to 50-3200)

9-point autofocus system

3 frames per second continuous shooting

2.5-inch LCD screen

 

 

Canon 5D Mark II

 

The Canon 5D Mark II was released in 2008 and was a significant upgrade from the Mark I. The camera featured a 21.1-megapixel CMOS sensor, a 9-point autofocus system, and a maximum ISO of 25600. One of the most significant improvements in the Canon 5D Mark II was its video capabilities, with the ability to shoot 1080p video at 30fps.

 

The addition of video capabilities in the Canon 5D Mark II was a game-changer for filmmakers. It allowed them to shoot high-quality video with a relatively affordable camera, which opened up new possibilities for filmmaking. The camera also featured improved dynamic range and low-light performance, making it even more versatile for photographers.

 

Another significant improvement in the Canon 5D Mark II was its Live View mode, which allowed photographers to preview their shots on the camera's LCD screen before taking the picture. This was a significant improvement over the Mark I, which did not have a Live View mode.

 

The 5D II was an improvement for still photographers but it was really a massive leap for Canon and launched the careers of many film makers who could now get dreamy, short focus cinematic images without the need for cinema video cameras at ten times the price. The 5D II marked the beginning of a phase, only just coming to a close, in which you would turn up for a job and be using the same equipment as the videographer. I knew film making groups , like Manchester’s ‘Bokeh, Yeah’ that were set up as a result of the launch of this camera and its contemporaries. The mark 2’s use of quality optics and 35mm equivalent sensors brought cinematographic images to the masses when video cameras at the time were still using small sensors with their inevitable deep, and deeply non-cinematic, front to back sharpness. Since the mk2, contemporary pro digital stills cameras are with few exceptions exemplary video shooters, albeit with some designed in limitations to increase the attractiveness of more specialised equipment.

 

The Canon 5D Mark II did however have limitations in terms of autofocus performance, which was a significant issue for photographers who needed fast and accurate autofocus. Here, you were forced into 1DX territory with that camera body's associated financial and physical weight.

 

Canon 5D Mark II

 

21.1-megapixel CMOS sensor

ISO range of 100-6400 (expandable to 50-25600)

9-point autofocus system

3.9 frames per second continuous shooting

Full HD video recording at 1080p

 

 

Canon 5D Mark III

 

The Canon 5D Mark III was released in 2012 and was a significant improvement from the Mark II. The camera featured a 22.3-megapixel CMOS sensor, a 61-point autofocus system, and a maximum ISO of 25600 (expandable to 102400). The autofocus system in the Canon 5D Mark III was a significant improvement over the Mark II, with faster and more accurate autofocus performance.

 

Another significant improvement in the Canon 5D Mark III was its improved dynamic range and noise performance. The camera's sensor and improved dynamic range meant that images were even sharper, more detailed, and had even more accurate colours. The camera performed even better in low-light conditions, with the expanded ISO range allowing for even better results in dark environments.

 

The Mark III also featured an increased frame rate. The camera could shoot up to 6 frames per second, which was a significant improvement over the 3.9 frames per second in the Mark II. This made it a more attractive option for photographers who needed a faster frame rate, such as sports or wildlife photographers.

 

The Canon 5D Mark III also featured improved video capabilities, with the ability to shoot 1080p video at up to 60fps. The camera also had a headphone jack and improved audio controls, making it a more versatile option for filmmakers.

 

Overall, the Canon 5D Mark III was a significant improvement over the Mark II in terms of autofocus performance, image quality, and technical capabilities.

 

This camera was so good that I didn't upgrade to the Mark IV. Autofocus was much quicker even with the heavy glass elements in L-series lenses, image quality was improved but, in reality, was only a marginal gain over the mk II. Increased dynamic range and high ISO performance are the holy grails for me, the mk III provided another incremental improvement in dynamic range but ISO performance, while expanded, may have been useful for wildlife and sports shooters looking for fast shutter speeds in bright conditions, but in the low light conditions that I'm often shooting in, gain noise at over ISO 1600 was excessive. The struggle, sadly to this day, continues!

In its dotage, my mark II developed a hotshoe problem that meant that auto metering of flash output was impossible. Faced with the expense and more importantly the cost in time of a repair, I upgraded to the mark 3. The mk2 subsequently become my travel camera and has been around a bit, often in less than salubrious surroundings and less than luxurious luggage hence its scuffed paint and filthy strap. God knows the shutter count, to the moon and back, but it keeps on rolling…

 

Canon 5D Mark III

 

22.3-megapixel CMOS sensor

ISO range of 100-25600 (expandable to 50-102400)

61-point autofocus system

6 frames per second continuous shooting

Full HD video recording at 1080p at up to 60fps

 

Canon 5D Mark IV

 

The Canon 5D Mark IV was released in 2016 and featured a 30.4-megapixel CMOS sensor, a 61-point autofocus system, and a maximum ISO of 32000 (expandable to 102400). The autofocus system in the Mark IV was an improvement over the Mark III, with even faster and more accurate autofocus performance.

 

One of the most significant improvements in the Canon 5D Mark IV was its dual-pixel autofocus system, which was first introduced in the Canon EOS 70D. The dual-pixel autofocus system allowed for faster and more accurate autofocus performance in Live View mode, making it easier to capture sharp images in challenging situations.

 

Another significant improvement in the Canon 5D Mark IV was its improved dynamic range and noise performance. The camera's sensor and improved dynamic range meant that images were even sharper, more detailed, and had even more accurate colours. The camera also performed exceptionally well in low-light conditions, with the expanded ISO range allowing for even better results in dark environments.

 

The Canon 5D Mark IV also featured improved video capabilities, with the ability to shoot 4K video at up to 30fps. The camera also had improved audio controls, making it a more versatile option for filmmakers.

 

One of the most significant improvements in the Canon 5D Mark IV was its built-in WiFi and GPS capabilities. The WiFi feature allowed photographers to quickly and easily transfer images to their computer or smartphone, while the GPS feature allowed them to geotag their images with location data.

 

Overall, the Canon 5D Mark IV was a significant improvement over the Mark III in terms of autofocus performance, image quality, and technical capabilities. The dual-pixel autofocus system and built-in WiFi and GPS features made it a more versatile option for photographers and filmmakers.

 

Canon 5D Mark IV

 

30.4-megapixel CMOS sensor

ISO range of 100-32000 (expandable to 50-102400)

61-point autofocus system with dual-pixel autofocus

7 frames per second continuous shooting

4K video recording at up to 30fps

 

Conclusion

 

The Canon 5D series has been a popular choice among professional photographers and filmmakers since the release of the original 5D in 2005. Each model in the series has seen significant improvements in image quality and technical capabilities, it's been my go-to series offering pro level build quality and weather sealing, pro level imaging and a price point that while not cheap, is less mortgage worrying than the 1DX series. If you didn't need the lightning-fast burst speeds of a sports shooter and unlike the newspaper shooters you were buying your own equipment, it was a no brainer and it was bomb proof and totally reliable.

In 20 years I never had a body fail and I’ve dropped them and had them filled with rainwater so you could see it behind the screens. I dried them out in an oven - not recommended - and they trudged on for years like nothing had happened.

 

Epilogue: The Canon 5D Mark V

 

Speculation about the Mk V update gave way to scepticism after the 2018 launch of the Canon EOS R mirrorless camera and Canon confirmed that the Mk IV would be the end of the line for its popular DSLR range in June 2020 leaving the 1D X Mark III as its final SLR.

 

While the reasons behind Canon's decision not to produce a 5D Mark V are not entirely clear, it is likely a combination of factors that contributed to the decision. The rise of mirrorless cameras, shifting customer preferences, high development costs, and the popularity and longevity of the existing 5D cameras are all factors that may have influenced Canon's decision. Ultimately, Canon's decision to focus on developing new mirrorless cameras and expanding its camera line-up with new product lines such as the EOS R series may also have played a significant role.

 

So, professionals were left with a simple step over to the EOS R mirrorless system, right? Not quite, The EOS R is based, as the name suggests, around a new R mount, necessitating replacing the previous EF lenses with newer RF lenses. EF lenses can be used on R mount cameras with an adapter, but if you go all in with the new - and excellent - range of RF lens then you’re not bolting them to your old EF bodies, adapter or not.

 

Canon had been rolling out R mount glass for a while and the reviews of these lenses were stellar so, notwithstanding the lens compatibility issues, we could expect a pretty painless transition to the EOS R, that was until the reviews started to come in.

 

While the new glass was of high quality, there was limited lens selection at launch; when the Canon EOS R was first released, it only had four native RF lenses available, which was a relatively limited selection compared to Canon's vast line-up of EF and EF-S lenses. Pro photographers who had the cash to completely upgrade to the new system would be forced to adapt their EF glass at first.

 

The EOS R only had a single SD card slot, which was a concern for professional photographers who require a backup storage option especially when they’d become accustomed to it in the 5D mk3 and mk4.

 

No in-body image stabilization: The EOS R did not have in-body image stabilization, which was a drawback for photographers who rely on this feature for shooting in low light or when using longer focal length lenses.

 

Limited battery life: The EOS R has a relatively short battery life compared to other mirrorless cameras on the market, which may be a concern for photographers who shoot for extended periods of time.

 

Crop factor when using EF lenses: While the EOS R can use EF lenses with an adapter, these lenses will have a crop factor of 1.6x, which may be a drawback for photographers who require a full-frame field of view.

 

So, if you were a serious photographer who fancied using the excellent new lenses, didn't need a massive arsenal of focal length options, liked to shoot video and could use a little less size and weight, the EOS R was ticking a lot of boxes.

 

If you were a professional, shooting on the now defunct 5D and looking for an upgrade or replacement, the landscape looked a bit bare until some new EOS R bodies were announced. These came in the form of the R5 and R6, but we'll get into those in a future article.